Tag: M23

  • Tantalum: The Conflict Mineral Inside Every Phone You’ve Ever Owned

    In February 2026, landslides collapsed several artisanal coltan mines near Rubaya in North Kivu province, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. At least 227 miners were killed. The Rubaya mines are controlled by M23 — a rebel militia backed by Rwanda and Uganda — which seized the site in 2024 and generates an estimated $800,000 per month from mineral extraction to fund its insurgency. UN experts report that more than 120 tonnes of coltan are transported monthly from the DRC into Rwanda, where it is laundered and exported as Rwandan product to smelters in China, Europe, and the United States. The coltan is processed into tantalum — a heat-resistant metal with a melting point of 3,290°C — and manufactured into the tiny capacitors inside every smartphone, laptop, game console, medical pacemaker, and automotive control unit on the planet. A single smartphone contains 30 to 60 milligrams of tantalum. With 1.2 billion smartphones shipped annually, that single application consumes 36 to 72 metric tonnes — roughly 5% of total global production. In December 2024, the DRC filed an unprecedented legal case against Apple, accusing its Belgian and French subsidiaries of using conflict minerals that fuel violence in eastern Congo. Apple reported $112 billion in net profits that year. The tantalum in one of its phones is worth a few dollars.

    What tantalum does

    Tantalum’s industrial value comes from a combination of properties that no other element replicates at the same scale and cost. A melting point of 3,290°C — exceeded only by tungsten and rhenium. Exceptional corrosion resistance — tantalum is virtually inert to hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and most organic acids below 150°C, which is why it lines chemical processing equipment and surgical implants. And the property that makes it indispensable to the electronics industry: tantalum forms a thin, stable oxide layer that functions as an extraordinarily effective dielectric, enabling capacitors that are smaller, more reliable, and more thermally stable than any alternative.

    Tantalum capacitors operate at temperatures exceeding 200°C, making them essential for processors, memory modules, and power management circuits in smartphones, laptops, data centers, and automotive electronics. They are the reason modern electronics can be as small as they are — the capacitor that regulates voltage in your phone’s processor is a tantalum component measured in fractions of a millimeter. Beyond electronics: tantalum is alloyed into nickel-based superalloys for jet engine turbine blades (the same high-temperature aerospace applications where rhenium and samarium cobalt magnets operate), used in armor-piercing military projectiles, and deployed in surgical implants — hip replacements, cranial plates, wire sutures — because the human body does not reject it.

    Where it comes from

    The DRC leads global tantalum production, accounting for over 37% of the world’s output. Rwanda is second. Brazil third at 22%. Australia, which once dominated production, has largely withdrawn — its largest mine, Wodgina, shifted to lithium spodumene production when lithium prices made the conversion economically irresistible. Artisanal and small-scale mining collectively accounts for an estimated 64% of global tantalum production — the highest artisanal proportion of any critical mineral in the Rare Earth Elements course.

    The DRC-Rwanda corridor is the supply chain’s defining feature and its deepest problem. North Kivu province contains an estimated 80% of the DRC’s coltan reserves, making it a strategic chokepoint for global tantalum supply. The Rubaya area alone accounts for roughly 15% of global coltan output. M23 and approximately 10,000 Rwandan troops control the extraction, trade, and smuggling of minerals from Rubaya. Artisanal miners — approximately 40,000 in the broader North Kivu region — earn $3-5 per day extracting material worth hundreds of dollars per kilogram on international markets. The ore is carried across the border into Rwanda, where it enters the legitimate supply chain as “Rwandan production.” Rwanda’s mineral export revenues tripled from $373 million in 2017 to over $1.75 billion in 2024 — a growth rate that, as multiple UN investigations have noted, far exceeds what Rwanda’s domestic mineral deposits could plausibly explain.

    The laundering operation is structurally identical to the commodity-laundering schemes the Shadowcraft course documents across multiple case studies — Marc Rich moving sanctioned oil through shell companies, BCCI moving funds through layered accounts, Mossack Fonseca providing the corporate shells. The DRC coltan trade uses Rwanda as its laundering jurisdiction: conflict-origin ore enters Rwanda, is relabeled as Rwandan production, is exported to smelters in China and Southeast Asia, is processed into tantalum powder, is manufactured into capacitors by KEMET, Vishay, AVX, and other component manufacturers, and appears in the products of Apple, Samsung, Intel, and every other electronics company on Earth. The supply chain has 6-8 intermediary steps between the mine where 227 people died in February 2026 and the phone in your pocket.

    The compliance architecture

    The global response to tantalum’s conflict mineral status has produced one of the most elaborate compliance frameworks in the critical minerals landscape — and one of the least effective at changing what happens on the ground.

    The 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, Section 1502, required U.S.-listed companies to audit their supply chains and report to the SEC whether their products contained tin, tantalum, tungsten, or gold — the “3TG” conflict minerals — sourced from the DRC or adjoining countries. The EU’s Conflict Minerals Regulation, effective since 2021, requires importers of 3TG to conduct due diligence on their supply chains. The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides the international framework. Smelters can be audited and certified as “conflict-free” through the Responsible Minerals Initiative’s Responsible Minerals Assurance Process. Intel publicly committed to conflict-free processors in 2012 and conducted third-party audits of all its smelters. KEMET, the world’s largest tantalum capacitor manufacturer, established a “closed-pipe” supply chain from its Kisengo mine in Katanga province to its processing plant in Matamoros, Mexico.

    The compliance infrastructure exists. The conflict minerals trade continues. M23 controls Rubaya. Rwanda launders the output. Smelters in China process ore whose chain of custody is, in many cases, impossible to verify. The Dodd-Frank reporting requirement was weakened under the Trump administration in 2017. The compliance adds 2-8% to project budgets, which legitimate operators absorb and conflict operators avoid. The structural problem is that tantalum from Rubaya is chemically identical to tantalum from Brazil — once it’s been smelted, no analytical technique can distinguish conflict-origin metal from certified-clean metal. The compliance framework is built on paperwork. The laundering operation is built on chemistry.

    Why it’s in the course

    Tantalum is the Rare Earth Elements course’s most direct intersection of critical minerals, armed conflict, and consumer electronics. The cobalt/coltan post introduced the conflict minerals framework across the DRC’s mineral economy. This post goes deeper on a single element — the one where the mine-to-phone supply chain is most documented, most laundered, and most directly connected to an active military conflict funded by the mineral itself.

    The antimony supply chain vulnerability is about Chinese export controls. The terbium supply chain vulnerability is about Chinese separation monopoly. The nickel supply chain vulnerability is about Indonesian resource nationalism. Tantalum’s vulnerability is different from all of those: 64% of global production is artisanal, a significant fraction is controlled by an armed rebel group, the laundering infrastructure has been documented by UN investigators for two decades, and the compliance framework designed to address it cannot distinguish clean metal from conflict metal once it’s been smelted. The supply chain isn’t concentrated in one country the way gallium or graphite is. It’s concentrated in one conflict zone, with one laundering corridor, funding one war — and the metal that comes out the other end is inside the device you’re reading this on.

    This is the kind of supply chain our Rare Earth Elements course was built to map — where a capacitor smaller than a grain of rice depends on a metal mined by hand in a war zone, laundered through a neighboring country, smelted into anonymity, and soldered into 1.2 billion phones a year by companies whose compliance paperwork says the supply chain is clean.

  • Cobalt, Coltan, and Conflict Minerals: The State of Play in 2026

    In January 2025, the M23 rebel group—backed by Rwanda and approximately 10,000 Rwandan troops, according to UN investigators—seized Goma, the capital of North Kivu province in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. More than 3,000 people were killed in less than two weeks of fighting. An estimated 2,400 Congolese soldiers surrendered en masse. Over 150 female inmates were raped and burned to death during a jailbreak in the chaos. M23 then advanced south and captured Nyabibwe, another mining hub, less than a year after seizing Rubaya—a site that harbors one of the world’s largest deposits of coltan and supplies roughly 15 percent of global tantalum production.

    In February 2026, landslides collapsed several artisanal coltan mines at Rubaya, killing at least 227 workers. It was the fourth deadly landslide Global Witness had documented at the site in 18 months. The miners were working in territory controlled by M23. The coltan they extracted was being transported into Rwanda—more than 120 tonnes per month, according to UN experts—where it was laundered and exported as Rwandan product to China, Europe, and the United States. Some of it is in the device you’re reading this on.

    That last sentence isn’t rhetoric. It’s supply chain arithmetic. The DRC produces approximately 70 percent of the world’s cobalt and holds roughly 60 percent of global coltan reserves. These minerals are essential components in the lithium-ion batteries that power electric vehicles, smartphones, laptops, and advanced weapons systems. The International Energy Agency projects that global cobalt demand will quadruple by 2030. The connection between a mine collapse in North Kivu and a phone in your pocket is not metaphorical. It is three to four intermediaries long, and nearly a billion dollars vanishes from the legal supply chain annually through the middlemen who mix illegally sourced minerals with certified ones.

    What conflict minerals actually are

    The term “conflict minerals” refers to tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold—the “3TGs”—mined in conditions where the proceeds finance armed conflict or the minerals are extracted through forced labor. The designation originates from Section 1502 of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which required U.S.-listed companies to disclose whether their products contained minerals sourced from the DRC or adjoining countries. Cobalt was not included in the original definition, though it arguably should have been—the same armed groups, child labor networks, and supply chain opacity that characterize 3TG extraction apply to cobalt with equal or greater force.

    Coltan—short for columbite-tantalite—is processed into tantalum, a heat-resistant metal used in capacitors for mobile phones, computers, medical equipment, and aerospace components. Cobalt is essential for the cathodes in lithium-ion batteries. Together, these two minerals account for a disproportionate share of the DRC’s strategic value and a disproportionate share of its human suffering. Of the estimated 255,000 Congolese mining cobalt, approximately 40,000 are children, some as young as six, working with hand tools for less than $2 per day.

    The 2025 escalation

    The M23 offensive that captured Goma in January 2025 represented the most serious military escalation in the DRC’s eastern provinces in over two decades. The fall of the provincial capital—home to over a million people—triggered a humanitarian crisis that displaced at least 100,000 from camps in the volatile east on top of the millions already displaced by decades of conflict. M23 and allied forces now control North and South Kivu, bordering Rwanda and Burundi, and much of Ituri province with its lucrative gold mines bordering Uganda.

    The mineral dimension of the conflict is not incidental. A UN official told the Security Council that coltan trade from Rubaya’s mines generates an estimated $300,000 per month in revenue for M23. Updated estimates from other UN reporting suggest the figure may be closer to $800,000 per month. “It’s not a coincidence that the zones occupied by the rebels are mining areas,” said Patrick Okenda, a researcher at Global Witness. “It takes money to wage war. Access to mining sites finances the war.”

    Rwanda’s role is particularly complicated. President Paul Kagame has acknowledged that minerals flow through Rwanda from the DRC but frames it as smuggling rather than state-sponsored extraction. A 2024 UN report documented that Uganda falsely labels DRC-sourced minerals as domestic exports. Between 2020 and 2021, Uganda exported $2.25 billion in gold despite minimal domestic production. The U.S. Treasury Department reported in 2022 that over 90 percent of the DRC’s gold was being smuggled to regional states, particularly Rwanda and Uganda, before being refined and exported to international markets through the UAE.

    The Washington Accords

    The Trump administration intervened directly in the conflict under the framework of securing critical mineral access. In June 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosted DRC and Rwandan officials to initial a preliminary accord. In December 2025, the Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity were signed at a presidential summit, witnessed by the leaders of Angola, Kenya, and Burundi.

    The accords explicitly tied peace negotiations to mineral access for U.S. corporations. The Modern War Institute at West Point published an analysis describing the arrangement as a potential “cobalt quagmire,” warning that Washington risked being drawn into a proxy war in some of Africa’s deadliest terrain. The DRC’s President Tshisekedi had solicited a formal security pact—effectively trading mineral access for American military support—and the analysis noted that “factors that make [the DRC] an attractive node in a critical mineral supply strategy, such as resource abundance and a transactional head of state, also make it a risky place to do business.”

    European private military contractors had already failed in the theater. Several hundred Romanian contractors deployed across eastern DRC from 2022 to 2025. When M23 captured Goma, nearly 300 of them were surrounded and captured, paraded before media, and eventually repatriated through Rwanda.

    The export quota system

    In February 2025, the DRC government suspended cobalt exports for four months to address market oversupply—cobalt prices had been depressed by overproduction and reduced demand from battery chemistry shifts toward lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathodes, which use no cobalt. In October 2025, the government introduced export quotas: companies were allocated specific monthly export volumes, with a 10 percent royalty plus a 5 percent strategic minerals levy. A 9,600-tonne “strategic reserve” was placed under the control of ARECOMS, the DRC’s new mineral regulation authority. Companies that don’t use their full allocations lose them to the government reserve starting January 2026.

    The quota system represents the DRC’s most aggressive move to control its mineral wealth. Industry analysts at CRU Group described it as “a fundamental shift from market-based supply to government-controlled allocation.” The system also mandates electronic tracking of all mineral exports through the Better Sourcing Program, a partnership with RCS Global. Whether the tracking system can actually distinguish legally sourced cobalt from conflict-sourced cobalt in a country where “legal and illegal cobalt quickly mingle,” as the Institute for Security Studies’ Oluwole Ojewale described it, is the question on which the entire framework depends.

    The supply chain problem nobody has solved

    The DRC captures approximately 3 percent of the value in the battery and EV supply chain despite supplying 70 percent of the cobalt. Almost all cobalt mined in the DRC is shipped to China for refining—China processed 77 percent of the world’s cobalt in 2022. The DRC sells raw material. China sells batteries. The value multiplier between the two ends of the chain is roughly 20 to 1.

    The DRC has ambitions to move up the chain. A Bloomberg study identified the DRC as a favorable location for battery precursor production—building a plant there would cost three times less than in the U.S. or China, cut supply-chain emissions by 30 percent, and keep more value in-country. The EU signed strategic partnerships with the DRC and Zambia on critical raw material value chains in 2023. The U.S., DRC, and Zambia signed a memorandum of understanding in 2022 to develop integrated EV battery production. None of these initiatives has yet produced a functioning refinery at scale in the DRC. The infrastructure gap—roads, electricity, skilled labor—remains enormous, and the security situation in the eastern provinces makes investment in processing capacity a proposition that requires either extraordinary risk tolerance or the kind of military guarantee that the Washington Accords are attempting to provide.

    Alternative cobalt sources are in development. Jervois Global’s Idaho Cobalt Operations targets 1,500 tonnes per year with a restart planned for Q2 2026. Fortune Minerals’ NICO Project in Canada has an estimated capacity of 1,728 tonnes per year. Global cobalt production is approximately 130,000 tonnes annually, overwhelmingly from the DRC. The alternative sources represent rounding errors.

    Battery chemistry is shifting. LFP cathodes—which contain no cobalt—are gaining market share, particularly in Chinese EVs and Tesla’s standard-range vehicles. But high-performance applications, particularly long-range EVs and consumer electronics, still require nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) or nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) cathodes. Cobalt isn’t going away. The question is whether the supply chain that delivers it can be made less dependent on a country where 227 miners die in a landslide at a site controlled by a rebel militia backed by a neighboring government, and the coltan they extracted still makes it into your phone.

    The honest answer, in 2026, is no. Not yet. Possibly not soon.

    We cover the full geopolitics and chemistry of cobalt, coltan, lithium, and 33 other critical elements across our Rare Earth Elements & Critical Minerals course—including why the supply chain for the green energy transition runs through the deadliest conflict zone on earth.