Rank-and-file soldiers in the Myanmar military — the Tatmadaw — are required to invest a portion of their salaries in shares of a conglomerate called Myanma Economic Holdings Limited. They generally receive an annual dividend in September. The conglomerate they’re investing in owns the country’s dominant beer brand, controls the jade mining monopoly in Kachin State, operates a bank, runs a pension fund, and was sanctioned by the United States and United Kingdom in March 2021 for its role in funding a military that had just overthrown the elected civilian government. The soldiers buying shares are also the soldiers conducting the operations those shares help fund. MEHL is one of two massive conglomerates — the other is the Myanmar Economic Corporation, or MEC — that form the economic backbone of the Tatmadaw. Together they own at least 106 businesses and are affiliated with another 27 through corporate structures. They are the mechanism by which Myanmar’s military has maintained financial autonomy from civilian oversight for more than three decades, generating revenue streams that are not accountable to parliament and that have contributed directly, according to the United Nations, to “a wide array of international human rights and humanitarian law violations.”
Two conglomerates, one army
MEHL — originally named the Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Limited, or UMEHL — was established in February 1990 under the Special Companies Act, two years after the 1988 military coup. It was created to generate profits from light industry and commercial trade during the junta’s transition from a socialist command economy. Initial capital was $1.6 billion. The conglomerate is jointly owned by two military departments: 40 percent of shares belong to the Directorate of Defence Procurement, and 60 percent belong to active-duty and veteran military personnel, including high-ranking officials from the ruling junta. MEHL has been exempt from commercial and profit taxes. By 2007, it wholly owned 77 firms, nine subsidiaries, and seven affiliated companies, spanning banking, construction, mining, agriculture, tobacco, food, transportation, real estate, and precious stones.
MEC was established in 1997 by Lieutenant General Tin Hla with a complementary mandate: heavy industry. Where MEHL handles consumer-facing businesses — beer, cigarettes, trading, jade — MEC handles the industrial base: steel plants, cement factories, mining operations, manufacturing, telecommunications, and an insurance monopoly. By 2009, MEC operated 21 factories, including four steel plants, a cement plant, a bank (Innwa Bank), and supply operations providing raw materials directly to the military. The U.S. Treasury Department’s designation described MEC as “a holding company with businesses in the mining, manufacturing, and telecommunications sectors, as well as companies that supply natural resources to the military, and operate factories producing goods for use by the military.”
The division of labor is clean. MEHL generates consumer revenue and distributes dividends to military personnel. MEC builds the industrial infrastructure the military needs to operate autonomously. Together, they create a self-funding military apparatus that doesn’t depend on civilian government budgets, doesn’t answer to parliament, and can survive — as it demonstrated in February 2021 — the overthrow of the civilian government that nominally controlled the country.
The jade monopoly and the beer partnership
MEHL’s most valuable asset is its monopoly on jade mining in Kachin State, a conflict zone where the military has fought Kachin independence forces for decades. Myanmar produces an estimated 70 percent of the world’s jade, an industry valued at an estimated $31 billion annually — a figure larger than the country’s official GDP. MEHL controls access to the most lucrative mining sites in Hpakant, the heart of the jade belt, alongside approximately 20 Chinese-owned companies or their proxies. The jade revenue doesn’t appear in public budgets. It flows through MEHL’s corporate structure directly to military accounts.
The beer business generated international headlines. MEHL held a 45 percent stake in Myanmar Brewery Limited, which controlled over two-thirds of the country’s beer market and manufactured Myanmar Beer, Kirin Beer, ABC Stout, and Anchor Beer. The other 55 percent was owned by Japan’s Kirin Company, which acquired the stake from Fraser and Neave in 2015. A 2019 United Nations report on MEHL’s military ownership prompted sharp international criticism of Kirin’s financial relationship with the Tatmadaw. In 2017, Myanmar Brewery Limited — Kirin’s subsidiary — had made a $30,000 donation toward the military’s “clearance operations” in Rakhine State. Those clearance operations are what the rest of the world calls the Rohingya genocide, which the International Court of Justice has ordered Myanmar to prevent under the Genocide Convention. Kirin announced it would cut ties with MEHL in February 2021, immediately following the coup.
The sanctions gap
Following the February 2021 coup, the United States sanctioned both MEHL and MEC, impounding U.S.-held assets and forbidding American nationals from doing business with either entity. The United Kingdom followed promptly. But Myanmar’s principal trading partners — China, Thailand, India, Singapore — declined to impose sanctions. MEHL’s and MEC’s revenue streams are overwhelmingly regional. The beer is sold domestically. The jade goes to China. The steel stays in Myanmar. The construction projects serve the domestic market. Western sanctions can freeze assets in Western banks, but the conglomerates’ operating revenue comes from Asian markets that remain open.
The sanctions also can’t reach MEHL’s shareholder structure. The U.S. Treasury noted that MEHL has 1,793 institutional shareholders, including regional military commands and subordinate battalions, divisions, platoons, squadrons, and border guard forces. Shares are distributed across the entire armed forces with no public accountability, creating what Treasury described as “secret slush funds that the military uses to augment its operational budget.” The shareholders are the military. The military is the government. The government controls the regulatory apparatus that would enforce any domestic accountability. The circularity is the design.
In 2016, during the brief democratic interlude under Aung San Suu Kyi’s government, UMEHL announced it would “transition into a public company” — moving from the 1950 Special Companies Act to the 1914 Myanmar Companies Act, supposedly introducing transparency and tax obligations. Observers noted that if the Ministry of Defence remained a shareholder, dividends would still be tax-exempt under existing tax law. The restructuring changed the corporate registration. It didn’t change the ownership, the revenue flows, or the relationship between the conglomerate and the military that created it. The 1998 China Poly Group “divestiture” and the UMEHL “transition” are the same play: change the organizational chart, keep the personnel, keep the money, and announce reform.
What MEHL and MEC tell you
Stasi KoKo generated 25 billion Deutsche Marks through 180 front companies to keep East Germany solvent. MEHL and MEC do something structurally similar but more audacious — they don’t hide behind front companies. They operate in plain sight, under their own names, with shareholding structures that explicitly list military units as investors and coup leaders as board members. The British South Africa Company needed a royal charter to merge corporate and sovereign authority. The Tatmadaw doesn’t need a charter because it is the state. When you are both the government and the corporation, the distinction between public revenue and private profit ceases to exist — and the soldiers buying shares in the conglomerate that funds the operations they’re ordered to conduct become simultaneously the workforce, the investors, and the product.
We cover MEHL and MEC alongside Wagner Group’s resource extraction model, BCCI’s financial architecture, and 21 other case studies of covert institutional power across our Shadowcraft course — where Myanmar’s military conglomerates are the case study that proves you don’t need secrecy to operate without accountability. You just need to be the one writing the rules.
Leave a Reply